Small Woodland Owners' Group

Guardian online article - group ownership

Topics that don't easily fit anywhere else!

Guardian online article - group ownership

Postby Meadowcopse » Sat Jul 19, 2014 9:21 am

Meadowcopse
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:13 am
Location: Cheshire

Re: Guardian online article - group ownership

Postby Dexter's Shed » Sat Jul 19, 2014 11:13 am

I think that's a bloody brilliant idea, it would certainly take care of the thought "what happens to my woods when I die" as with that many people looking after it and leaving it to family members, it would continue to be looked after
Dexter's Shed
 
Posts: 748
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 5:29 pm
Location: essex and kent

Re: Guardian online article - group ownership

Postby oldclaypaws » Sat Jul 19, 2014 12:03 pm

In principle it sounds a great way of involving people in a wood and connecting to nature. I'd just question though whether 60 people sharing (and friends & family) means the wood might end up overused, there's going to be an aweful lot of feet trampling on a relatively small space, and as for some of them wanting firewood, 1/60th share of 3 acres doesn't leave much per person, so perhaps all deadwood is 'claimed' or used on campfires.

I think shared or community woods are a great idea, provided the impact on the wood isn't excessive to give the various animal inhabitants and flora 'recovery' time. I'd suggest there's an optimum number of owners per acre, and personally think anything over one / acre might put pressure on the ecology, unless access is rationed.

Looking at the mushrooming price of woods, this might be the only option for many people. I notice a newly listed Somerset woodland by woodlands.co.uk is £39,000 for 3 acres, or £13,000 an acre. Its part of the larger 107 acre Warleigh Wood near Bath which was marketed by Cleggs.
oldclaypaws
 
Posts: 1132
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 5:13 pm

Re: Guardian online article - group ownership

Postby Meadowcopse » Sat Jul 19, 2014 12:37 pm

I've been involved for 20 years with a group formed as an educational charitable trust that started with an ex-Forestry Commission clear felled plot of 28 acres.

Although the mixed woodland planted is reasonably successful, it is easy to loose a year in committee 'non-decisions' and with up to 100+ members, the mix of democracy, technical competency and personalities can be an interesting mix...
Meadowcopse
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:13 am
Location: Cheshire

Re: Guardian online article - group ownership

Postby smojo » Sat Jul 19, 2014 2:08 pm

It's a nice idea if you've got a limited budget but I wouldn't want to have to organise all those folks and sort out the differences. One of the best things of owning your own is that there's nobody else there if you don't want them to be. 8-)
smojo
 
Posts: 412
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 7:47 pm

Re: Guardian online article - group ownership

Postby Dexter's Shed » Sat Jul 19, 2014 2:32 pm

smojo wrote:It's a nice idea if you've got a limited budget but I wouldn't want to have to organise all those folks and sort out the differences. One of the best things of owning your own is that there's nobody else there if you don't want them to be. 8-)


your quite right, but I suppose they idea appeals to me, for when Im gone, as my kids are not really into woods, not unless it has a wi fi network attached to it, then I could see it getting sold off
Dexter's Shed
 
Posts: 748
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 5:29 pm
Location: essex and kent

Re: Guardian online article - group ownership

Postby SimonFisher » Sat Jul 19, 2014 3:05 pm

Dexter's Shed wrote:but I suppose they idea appeals to me, for when Im gone, as my kids are not really into woods, not unless it has a wi fi network attached to it, then I could see it getting sold off

Leave it to someone other than your kids then?
SimonFisher
 
Posts: 614
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 5:00 pm

Re: Guardian online article - group ownership

Postby smudge » Sat Jul 19, 2014 3:35 pm

Leaving mine to my family if this generation don't want it the next might the good thing about woodland is you can leave it for years without doing anything it still goes on being buried on mine so will have to see solicitors on how to word it so it stays as it is,
smudge
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 11:59 am

Re: Guardian online article - group ownership

Postby smojo » Sat Jul 19, 2014 3:41 pm

your quite right, but I suppose they idea appeals to me, for when Im gone, as my kids are not really into woods, not unless it has a wi fi network attached to it, then I could see it getting sold off


Similar situation for me. No-one else all that interested but I figured this is about me doing something for me for a change and as it seems a good investment, I'm happy to enjoy it as long as I can and leave it in a better state than when I got it. What happens after that - well no point in thinking about it cos no matter what you might intend for it, there's no guarantee it will happen.
smojo
 
Posts: 412
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 7:47 pm

Re: Guardian online article - group ownership

Postby Zathras » Sat Jul 19, 2014 10:00 pm

Interesting approach having so many people involved.

Surely with only 30 days for change of use and 60 people then usage for art classes or such is going to be very difficult to manage?
Zathras
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 6:01 am
Location: Berkshire

Next

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests