Any designers out there?

[tracy]

Sounds good - send us a picture!

[tracy]

We have had a vote for the bottom one, with the comment:

Of the 3 designs, I much prefer the bottom one, but suggest it would be better with roots instead of leaves below the SWOG text. A bit like the tree of life.

Any other thoughts?

The pictures are here:

http://www.swog.org.uk/news/swog-logo/

Bit quiet out there at the moment....are you all too busy in your woods ;-)

[jillybean]

Hi guys, Yes I prefer the bottom one too.

[Ambo]

Hi everyone

I have to agree with tracy about the bottom logo with roots

We all know what the obvious choice could be, but what about the colouring ?

[tracy]

2 - 3 colours is the cheaper and easier option. My thought is - do we need a strap line as well with our website address (small)?

[jillybean]

I feel it should say small woodland owners group rather than the acronym as SWOG is a particularly unattractive word, and also is the same as the south western oncology group. as for colours, gold and russet on a green background?

[James M]

I view the site as being about the people - woodland owners, rather than woodlands. Why not use a photo from one of your gatherings of members with the name superimposed?

[DaveTaz]

I agree with James, there should be something on there connecting people to trees/woodland

[MartinD]

I agree (a little bit) with jillybean - swog doesn't sound good. How about something based on 'swogger'.

Of the 3 designs, I prefer the bottom one, with leaves or roots

[Rod Taylor]

Heather has noted the above comments and is sitting with thinking cap on and pencil in hand scratching out another attempt based on the third design. Will wing this to Tracy on completion for comments.